Welcome!

Thanks for stopping by! If you like what you read, tell your friends! If you don't like what you read, tell your enemies! Either way, please post a comment, even if it's just to tell us how much we suck! (We're really needy!) You can even follow us @JasonBerner! Or don't! See if we care!







Friday, October 23, 2009

The Tipping Point

We're going to get in trouble with Honeypiehorse and Borealkraut for this one, but here goes:

We accept avoiding certain foods because they are fattening.

We can accept avoiding certain foods because they cause cancer.

We accept avoiding certain foods because they have been treated with nasty pesticides.

We can even accept, in theory, avoiding certain foods because they contain genetically modified organisms.

But now things are getting silly.

As if all of the above were not enough to permanently put one off one's feed, people must also now worry about whether their dinner is destroying the planet. ("To Cut Global Warming, Swedes Study Their Plates")

In Sweden, major food manufacturers and fast food chains trumpet the relative environmental virtues of their wares by including a measurement of the CO2 emissions associated with their production. At Max, the Swedish McDonald's, consumers are informed that the consumption of a hamburger entails the production of 1.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide, as opposed to the more earth-friendly 0.4-kilograms of CO2 released in the production of a chicken sandwich.

We hope Swedes enjoy carrots on those chicken sandwiches, as the hothouses needed to grow Swedish tomatoes will likely destroy the ozone layer and melt the polar ice caps.

Enough, already!

Extremism in the pursuit of virtue is a vice. We can all do our part to save the planet, and we should all be as conscientious as possible. But with every new restriction, every new warning, every new admonition against eating or drinking or driving or. . . or dancing (who knows?), our reserves of good will and social conscience dwindle.

Everything is a trade off. If we stop eating beef, then cows will reproduce exponentially and cover the earth! And consider that one of the Swedish government's recommended substitutes for red meat is beans, which, of course, pose greenhouse hazards of their own.

It's enough to make one throw up one's hands and drive the Hummer across the street to McDonald's where one can fill up on a nice, juicy, Amazon-deforesting Big Mac. If, in the long run, we're all dead, we might as well get there with plaque-filled arteries and a healthy sunburnt glow!

3 comments:

  1. Ah, but it's not about good will. It's about bad will and making conspicuous beef eaters feel totally uncool. Like those loosers that have to sit in that smoky little room at the airport because they haven't seen the light yet! Altruism will never save the world but social pressure just might.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If God didn't intend for man to eat cows, then why did He make them so delicious?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think he did intend us to eat them. The problem is, he didn't intend us to eat them for breakfast, lunch and dinner 7 days a week and cut down all the trees to feed them so anyone can buy a hamburger for $1.50 on every street corner in any major city in the world. I'm just saying.

    ReplyDelete