I love discovering new words, if for no other reason than to better equip myself for a game of "Scrabble." 'Irmus' wouldn't provide a whole lot of points (only 7, unless one makes strategic use of bonus squares), and it may not even appear in Scrabble dictionaries--it doesn't show up on dictionary.com. But the word--if the novelist Ann Beattie is to be believed (and novelists always tell the truth, right?)--does exist and refers to a tool of the literary trade, meaning“not until the end of a passage does the reader fully understand what is being spoken of.”
So if ever a writer kept you in suspense, pulling you along to a sentence's shocking climax? You got irmused!
You may remember yesterday. I don't, but you may. And if you do remember yesterday, you remember that "The Solipsist" featured news about how a number of students at elite colleges are opting out of the physical sciences and into easier majors in social sciences, humanities, or gym. Anyway, when I read the original Times article that inspired that piece, I was struck by this sentence:
“We’re two years into that experiment and, quite honestly, it’s probably going to take 5 to 10 years before we’re really able to inflesh the whole curriculum with this project-based learning,” Dean Kilpatrick says. ("Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It's Just So Darn Hard)""Inflesh"? According, again, to dictionary.com, to "inflesh" is to "incarnate." This makes perfect sense as the root of "incarnate" ("carne") means "meat" or "flesh" (as in "carnivore," or "chili con carne"). In other words, to "inflesh" is to "make into meat" or, less literally, to "make real."
A couple of interesting points:
1) The dictionary definition ("incarnate") is arguably a more sophisticated word than the word it is defining ("inflesh").
2) "Inflesh" may mean the same thing as "incarnate" but it has the added advantage of sounding kinda dirty.
3) Peter Kilpatrick, the dean of engineering at Notre Dame, apparently doesn't know the difference between "infleshing" (making real) and "infusing" (causing to penetrate), which is what he most likely meant--to spread the idea of "hands-on" science learning throughout the entire engineering curriculum. Not a big deal, I suppose, but when this trained engineer builds something, I hope he doesn't mix up infleshing and infusing. The results could get sticky.