Welcome!

Thanks for stopping by! If you like what you read, tell your friends! If you don't like what you read, tell your enemies! Either way, please post a comment, even if it's just to tell us how much we suck! (We're really needy!) You can even follow us @JasonBerner! Or don't! See if we care!







Saturday, March 14, 2009

Just Give Me a Damn Cup of Coffee!!!

"Hi!  Welcome to Starbucks San Pablo home of the best mocha lattes on the West Coast try our fresh, homemade oatmeal we also feature a wide variety of breakfast sandwiches you might also want to sample our music selection this week featuring U2's latest release as well as a collection of blues standards reinterpreted by some of today's biggest artists including Kanye West and Death Cab for Cutie and can we interest you in a travel mug? 25 cents off every purchase when you refill your travel mug 50 cents off on Tuesdays and if you buy one today a ten percent donation will be made to the World Wildlife Fund in your name are you interested yet? what have you got against wildlife? we also offer freshly baked muffins and starting tomorrow we'll be selling vanilla frosted butterscotch cupcakes so make sure to come back tomorrow and no, I'm sorry, you can't have one now even though, yes, we do have them but we've been told we can't start selling them until tomorrow and I don't want to get in trouble and I'm sure you wouldn't want me to get in trouble either unless you're some kind of jerk.  My name is Jennifer, what can I get for you?"

"Uh. . . . What?  Sorry, I drifted off there."

***************************************************
"Well-crafted" is a phrase that turns up a lot in movie reviews.  What does it mean?  From the evidence, it seems that "well-crafted" can mean simply that the film was spliced so as not to break halfway through the showing.  (And, heck, nowadays everything is digital anyway.)  It's like saying a book is well-written because most of the words are spelled correctly.  And if a movie is "heart-stopping," is that a good thing?

Just wondering.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Unjustified Knowledge

If you're a trivia buff, you know the question.

If you always do well when you play along with "Jeopardy!"; if you're always picked first for a "Trivial Pursuit" tournament; if you're the "go-to guy" at your workplace for the correct spelling of arcane vocabulary, then you've probably at some point been asked some variant of the following question:

"How did you know that?!?"

A fair question?  Not really.  Oh, in some cases it's more than fair--it's downright necessary.  If one of your colleagues walks up to you and proudly recites your social security number, you are not only justified but arguably also obligated to ask the question.  And you have every right to a specific answer.  For the most part, though, the question is probably unanswerable.  Are you really supposed to remember the circumstances under which you learned the name of the plastic part of a shoelace or the periodic table abbreviation for tungsten or the Korean word for 'giraffe'?  And even if you do remember, does it really matter HOW you know something?

And therein lies the problem with the question.  When the question is asked, it is usually not in the spirit of investigation, as in the social security number example.  Nor is it asked in a sort of reverential tone of deep respect and admiration of your knowledge.  In fact, the questioner is not really asking "How did you know that?" at all.

He's really asking, "WHY do you know that?"

Because underlying the question is an assumption that the knowledge is so obscure, so off-the-beaten-track, that there is something sinister in your possession of it.  A typical response is, "Oh, I don't know, something I picked up somewhere" or the slightly more self-aggrandizing, "I read a lot" (often said with a small shrug and shake of the head so as to deflect accusations of braggadocio).  But why such a display of false modesty (as we've established that all modesty is)?  If you don't know "where" you know something from, say so.  If you happen to remember that you acquired some factoid from high-school chemistry or The Book of Lists or an overheard conversation, you may choose to provide the provenance if you wish.

But the most appropriate response?  How do you know that?

"I don't know how I know it, I just do.  And now, thanks to me, you know it, too, so I hope you'll give me proper credit when you get to pass it along."

And if they ask the more honest and direct question--the one they really want to ask--"Why do you know that?"

"No particular reason.  Why don't you?"

By the way: Aglet, W, and Girin.

You're welcome.

Don't ask.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Pundits in Space

NASA has an online opinion poll, where they have asked people to help them name "Node 3" of the International Space Station. The NASA-suggested multiple choice options are:

--Earthrise
--Legacy
--Serenity
--Venture

None of these, however, is even in the top 10. See, people can also contribute their own suggestions. As of this writing, the leading vote-getter, outpolling ALL of NASA's suggested choices?

Colbert.

As in Stephen, host of "The Colbert Report." He's encouraged members of Colbert Nation to write-in his name on NASA's ballot, and obviously they've responded.

NASA's getting nervous, and they apparently have a right to reject the suggestion if it is not in NASA's best interests (i.e., to weasel out).

What are they worried about? Future generations? Assuming there ARE any future generations, is anyone going to care? How many things are out there in our great wide world named for people who are essentially unknown today? Take New York alone: Who exactly was Guggenheim? The now-demolished Shea Stadium was named for a lawyer known mostly for being the answer to the question, "Who was Shea Stadium named for?" The Verrazano Narrows Bridge? Who was Verrazano? For that matter, who was Narrows?

Memo to NASA: You set up a competition like this, you'd better be willing to live with the results. And at least the name "Colbert" has a certain regal ring to it. It's not like people are voting for "The Buttmunch Room."

"Node 3" is starting to look better and better.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Enjoying the Sunset

Short-story collections are inevitably hit and miss affairs.  They can't all be gems.  Stephen King's collection, Just After Sunset is no exception.

Make no mistake about it: Despite the judgments of numerous detractors (whose numbers, though, seem to have declined over the years), King can write.

(Shameless self-promotion digression: YNSHC actually wrote the entry on King for Continuum Publishing's Encyclopedia of American Literature (1999).  Look it up!  End of digression.)

He may not produce what many people consider to be capital-L Literature.  Then again, who knows?  Dickens, in his day, was a paid-by-the-word hack.  The only reason most of Shakespeare's works were even published was because a bunch of his buddies decided to bind his plays as a sort of tribute after the man's death.  Perhaps 100 years from now there will be an endowed chair of Stephen King studies at the University of Maine.  If there isn't already.

But Literature or not, the man knows how to tell a story.  He wastes no time establishing character, as the first paragraph of "A Very Tight Place," the last story in the collection makes clear:

"Curtis Johnson rode his bike five miles every morning.  He had stopped for a while after Betsy died, but found that without his morning exercise he was sadder than ever.  So he took it up again.  The only difference was that he stopped wearing his helmet.  He rode two and a half miles down Gulf Boulevard, then turned around and rode back.  He always kept to the bike lanes.  He might not care if he lived or died, but he respected the rule of law."

That last sentence, in fact--that violation of the writing-class edict to "show not tell"--is about the only thing that separates King from the realm of Literature.  But one suspects that it's not there because King lacks faith that his readers couldn't draw their own conclusions from his description; rather, King wants his stories to go down easy, like a cold beer on a hot day (about the level of sophistication of a typical King simile)--they are entertainments, and part of entertaining is making your guests as comfortable as possible while they spend time in your narrative world.

The irony, of course, is that Stephen King makes his readers comfortable while describing some highly uncomfortable predicaments.  In the story referenced above, the protagonist finds himself trapped in a none-too-clean port-a-potty.  In another story of a desperately trapped character, "The Gingerbread Girl" (the longest story in the book), a woman is bound to a kitchen chair by a serial killer, and the question that drives most of the plot is whether she'll free herself before her tormentor returns from his latest deadly mission.

The thrillers are the best stories in the collection.  In addition to "The Gingerbread Girl" and "A Very Tight Place," these include "Rest Stop," about a mild-mannered writer who has to channel his more-violent alter ego (his "inner Richard Bachman" as King describes it in the afterward) to rescue a victim of domestic violence; "N.," a sort of homage to H.P. Lovecraft; and "Mute," in which a man enters a confessional to expiate what may or may not be a mortal sin.

King's more-sentimental stories are less satisfying.  The semi-supernatural tales "Willa," "Ayana," and "The New York Times at Special Bargain Rates" all suffer from the fact that there doesn't seem to be much of anything at stake.  They are "nice" stories, and Stephen King just doesn't do "nice" all that well.

This is not a condemnation--far from it.  Anyone who can grab a reader's attention and keep him compulsively turning pages to see what happens next is far ahead of most writers, including most of those writers considered "Literary."  His short stories are like so much popcorn--not especially bad for you, eminently enjoyable.  And even if you get a little tired of popcorn, you know you're going to enjoy it again the next time you're in the mood. 

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Random Questions

Inspired by Emi Ha, the Solipsist will present today's post in list form.  Herewith, some random questions to ponder.  Please provide your answers in the comment space.

1) When did pajama pants become, y'know, pants?  Perhaps this is just a West Coast phenomenon.  The Solipsist teaches at a local institute of relatively higher-learning.  About eight years ago, the student body held an impromptu "Pajama Day": Students were allowed or encouraged or suffered to wear pajamas to school.  Teddy bears were plentiful, too.  It was a break in the monotony.  Now, however, EVERY day is Pajama Day (though without so many teddy bears thus far).  At the risk of sounding curmudgeonly, when did this become OK?  Kids today!  Harrumph!

2) Aside from Aquaman, can anyone really pull off orange and green as a fashion combination?

3) Actually, can Aquaman pull it off?

4) Isn't just about ALL modesty "false modesty"?  Consider: Let's say you're a person.  OK?  Now, suppose you're particularly good at something. . . . Archery, why not?  But when people praise you for hitting the bullseye or shooting the apple or whatever it is archers do to earn praise, you demur so as not to be seen as a jerk: "No big deal."  But of course, you KNOW it's a big deal.  How could you not?  So, in order not to be false, you should simply revel in the praise.  If you're good, say it loud, "I'm a badass archer and I'm proud."  Or whatever.

5) Can women be "assholes"?  Not saying that women can't ACT like assholes, but seriously, have you ever CALLED a woman an asshole?  Men can be bitches (and no, not just gay men, either).  Still, there seems to be something gender specific about this particular ano-orificular epithet.

6) What's going on with Jack's father on "Lost"?  Wasn't there some reference to him actually being alive in the first episode in which we move "forward" in time (about two seasons ago)?  Jack was back working at the hospital, and some other doctor mentions something to him in passing about his father, something that gave the distinct impression that Dad was still alive (and that made it seem--at that point--that we were just experiencing another flashBACK not a flashFORWARD).

7) Why is the sky blue?

8) Is anyone out there actually going to look up the answer to why the sky is blue?

9) Can two hot dogs from Target and a piece of butter cake with homemade butter-cream frosting be considered an adequate dinner?  No reason.

10) If you were at your friend's house for a holiday dinner, and you found a cockroach in the cole slaw what would you do?

Happy thinking!

Monday, March 9, 2009

Fun City

Quick, think of a major world city that is hostile to the idea of pillow fights and whipped cream.

Riyadh comes to mind.  So does Islamabad--let's face it, any city with "Islam" in its name is unlikely to sanction pillow fights.  For that matter, cities beginning with "Vatican" probably have similar biases.

The Solipsist is going to go out on a limb, though, and speculate that none of his faithful readers named "San Francisco."  Heck, most non-residents probably assume that visitors to this fair city are issued pillows and whipped cream upon disembarking at SFO.  (Actually, airport employees only issue whipped cream; visitors are encouraged to retain the pillow they receive on the airplane.)  Sad to say, though, that it is none other than the city by the bay that is cracking down on what may be the world's largest "organized" pillow fight.  

Every Valentine's Day for the past four years, a "flash mob" of sorts has staged a massive pillow fight at the Embarcadero.

(Digression: Since this has become a semi-regular event, it does not strictly meet the definition of a "flash mob," one characteristic of which is that they are somewhat "secret" so as to take observers by surprise.  Nevertheless, the spirit of antic fun implicit in a pillow fight certainly lends itself to the flash mob ideology.  End of digression.)

This year's festivities were the largest and longest so far.  Anywhere from 1,500 to 3,000 people participated, and the action, which began at 6:00 PM didn't end until after midnight.

(Digression: Can you imagine pummeling people (and being pummeled) with pillows for over six hours?  How  much Red Bull would one have to drink?  End of digression.)

The city is upset at the overtime and other costs incurred from having to clean up the mess left behind.

Now, the Solipsist is certainly sympathetic to the municipal authorities who have to clean up other people's messes.  At the same time, the total extra cost came to $19,000.   The city's budget for 2008-9 was over $6 billion; the budget for the Recreation and Park Department was over $137 million.  The point?  $19,000 is a rounding error.

Yes, these are troubled times for the economy, and government needs to be frugal.  But in dark times like these, people need the occasional whipped-cream coated pillow battle to keep up their spirits.  $19,000 to allow people to blow off some steam seems like a reasonable investment.

Addendum: For those who are interested, several web sites organize and document flash mob activities, including improveverywhere.com and eatbrains.com (which specializes in zombie-themed flash mobs).  Enjoy.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

The Worst Day of the Year

Like the new layout?  Figured it was time for a change.

*****************************************
Daylight Savings Time began today.  Or did it end today?  YNSHC has always had trouble keeping that one straight.  And the common mnemonic is useless: "Spring forward, fall back."  Easy, right?  But can't one just as easily fall forward and/or spring back?  No logic to these things.

More annoying than the mnemonic, though, is the whole concept of moving our clocks ahead an hour, thus losing that all-too-precious hour of sleep.  The first day of DST is truly the worst day of the year.  Name one that's worse?  Sure, September 11 and, for old-timers, December 7 have more sinister resonance, but those are DATES not "days."  They're significant for what happened on them--undeniably horrific but unlikely to be repeated.  They're days for remembrance.  April 15, likewise, has unpleasant connotations, but most of us have taken care of our IRS-related business long before that date rolls around (and more than a few of us get refunds anyway).

The first day of Daylight Savings Time, though, really has no redeeming characteristics.  Invariably, you go through the day somewhat groggy.  If you're one of those people who has to get up early in the morning to go to work, you can look forward to a week or so of getting up in darkness before the universe catches up with acts of Congress.

(Digression: Perhaps this can be seen as a silver-lining for those hordes of newly-unemployed--nearly 700,000 according to last week's news--who get to sleep through the later-morning darkness.  End of digression.)

"Sure, Solipsist," you may say, "but it stays light 'til way past 7:00 now!"

You're right, but so what?

Nobody really cares about the sun staying out later.  Nobody feels it in the bones.  What's going to happen tonight?  You're going to glance out the window at 6:00, and it'll still be light, but that won't register.  At 7:00, you'll look again, feel mildly disoriented as you glance at your watch, and remember what's going on.  And then you'll break into wild song and dance because it's 7:00 and the sun's still out, the sun's still out!

Well, of course you won't, and that's the point.

The Solipsist just glanced at his computer's clock and was shocked to see that it was already 5:27.  Except it isn't--it's 4:27.  And that, too, is the point.

Don't even mention the spike in traffic accidents and, apparently, as Father of Solipsist mentioned this morning, heart attacks we all have to look forward to in the next two weeks.

YNSHC would gladly surrender the best night of the year (the last Saturday in October) if he could be rid of the worst.  Join the crusade!